The Top 5 Smartwatches in the U.S.

Written by Belen Paoletti (Specialist in Emotional Branding, Expert in Research & Consumer Insights, and Data Marketing Strategist)
Art by Valentina Taraborelli

We’ve recently dived into the world of wearable technology as it weaves itself more deeply into our daily routines—transforming the humble wristwatch into a powerful tool for health, wellness, and everyday efficiency. Today’s smartwatches go far beyond telling time. They offer continuous health tracking, real-time feedback, and a more proactive approach to well-being. 

In a market flooded with brands all claiming to offer “the smartest watch,” we decided to cut through the noise and go straight to the source: everyday users. Instead of relying on spec sheets or marketing spin, we grounded this review in the voices of real people—those who’ve actually worn these devices day in and day out.

We analyzed over 10,000 user reviews from platforms like Amazon, Best Buy, Target, Reddit, and more—focusing on what people love, what frustrates them, and whether they truly feel these watches are worth the money. Based on that research, we built a data-informed ranking of the top 5 smartwatches in the U.S., highlighting key strengths, common downsides, and standout testimonials.

This isn’t about brand prestige or tech specs. It’s about lived experience—what it’s really like to wear these watches every day. Here’s how the top contenders stack up, from best to worst, according to the people who know them best: their users.

1. Apple Watch Ultra 2

User Ratings 

• Best Buy: 4.9/5 (~2,100+ reviews) 
• Target: 4.4/5 (~500+ reviews) 
• Amazon: 4.4/5 (~780 ratings)

Highlights 

• Battery Life: Perhaps the most-loved feature. Multiple reviewers report multi-day battery performance. Users were “blown away” by how long the Ultra 2 lasts—often 2+ days (up to ~36 hours) on a single charge. This endurance is a huge upgrade for those used to daily charging on regular Apple Watches. Even heavy users say the battery “easily” lasts a full day of workouts and still has plenty left.
  
• Rugged Durability: Owners attest that the Ultra 2 is extremely tough and well-built. The titanium case and sapphire crystal are holding up “fantastically” in real-world use. One user who works on trucks and construction sites said the watch is “tough” and “does not scratch!”—highlighting that it survived hard use without a mark. Many appreciate the peace of mind of not worrying about damage.
  
• Display (Screen): The Ultra 2’s large 49mm screen and higher brightness are widely celebrated. Users love the bigger, brighter Always-On Retina display, noting it’s “easy to read even in direct sunlight.” The extra screen real estate makes maps, messages, and fitness stats more glanceable. In short, “the vibrant display… makes it a standout wearable,” as one review put it.
  
• Health & Fitness Features: The Ultra 2 is “a powerhouse” for fitness enthusiasts. Reviewers praise its comprehensive health tracking: accurate heart-rate and ECG, ultra-precise dual-band GPS for runs/hikes, and even the depth gauge for divers. Serious athletes and adventurers find it an ideal companion—it “helps me stay on top of my wellness goals,” one user noted. The rugged Action Button and improved compass/GPS functions are often highlighted as useful for outdoor training.
  
• Design & Comfort: Despite its bulk, many users love the look and feel. The general consensus is that the build exudes quality (premium titanium finish) and the watch has a “stylish, sleek design.” A number of reviewers with previous smaller Apple Watches were surprised that the 49mm Ultra 2 “doesn’t feel heavy or bulky” after a few days of wear—they got used to the size quickly and actually enjoy the larger form factor. The included Alpine Loop/Trail Loop bands are described as comfortable by many, and the fit is secure for active use. (However, see band issues below—opinions on bands are mixed.)

Criticism

• High Price: By far the most frequent gripe is the $799 USD price tag. Many buyers feel the Ultra 2 is very expensive and not a great value for more casual users. Several comments in forums flatly state “it’s not worth it relative to its price unless you have a very special need or use case.” In other words, if you won’t utilize the Ultra 2’s extreme sports features, a cheaper Apple Watch might be a better buy. Even 5‑star reviews often preface with “it’s pricey, but…,” and then justify it with the features. Cost is the #1 factor dragging some ratings down to 4★ instead of 5★.
  
• Size & Weight: While many are fine with the large size, a minority of users (especially those with smaller wrists) do find the Ultra 2 big and heavy. Best Buy’s data shows “Weight” was flagged as a con by a handful of reviewers. A few people said the 49mm case looks huge on the wrist or felt awkward initially. One Target reviewer even noted it “looks big on my wrist lol,” though they still loved the watch. Overall, complaints about bulk are not widespread, but potential buyers with very slim wrists should be aware of the substantial form factor.
  
• Band and Fit Issues: Feedback about the included bands is mixed. Some love the Alpine/Trail loop, but others had issues: a few purchasers found the Trail Loop band’s quality or durability lacking. There are reports of the loop fraying or Velcro wearing out quickly. A Best Buy summary noted “concerns about the band’s size and material” for some users. Additionally, a couple of users found the band attachment fiddly—one Amazon review complained the included loop band was “nigh impossible to put on” at first, taking many attempts to slide in correctly. The good news is that the Ultra 2 is compatible with standard Apple Watch bands, so many owners simply swapped in a preferred strap. (One user admitted “the only issue… was the band it came with, but I already had a band… that’s easier to put on.”)
  
• Black Titanium Finish: The new black-colored case option drew excitement, but also a warning from some early adopters. At least one owner advised others “Don’t get the black one,” claiming the DLC black coating might not be durable—“seems the blk coating will not last long,” they wrote after seeing signs of wear. Prospective buyers who are worried about long-term cosmetics might stick with the natural titanium, as scuffs on the black finish could show more.
  
• Connectivity/Setup Hiccups: A small number of users encountered technical issues, particularly with cellular setup. In Best Buy’s reviews, a few mentioned complexity getting the LTE cellular service working on the watch. One 1★ review on Target said “there is no network availability” after 20 minutes of ownership—suggesting a defective unit or SIM activation problem. These cases seem rare but notable; the vast majority report the Ultra 2’s connectivity (Bluetooth, GPS, LTE) works flawlessly.
  
• Minor Performance Quibbles: Virtually no one complains about overall speed—the Ultra 2’s new S9 chip is fast—but there were isolated remarks about software. For example, one user was surprised that “some apps still feel a bit slow to load” on such a premium device. Others wish Apple would allow more customization (third-party watch faces, etc.), but these are general platform criticisms. By and large, the Ultra 2’s performance and WatchOS 10 features are reviewed positively, with no widespread reports of bugs or slowdowns in the past year.

Testimonials

• Everyday Users vs Adventurers: “Overall, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is ideal for those who need robust fitness tracking and durability, but might be overkill for everyday users.” This sentiment (from a 5★ Best Buy review) sums up a common theme. 
  
• Real-World Endurance Praise: One owner upgraded from a Series 6 and shared: “I have worn it swimming with no issue and I’ve worn it [to] build houses. It has zero problems. I literally cannot find anything wrong with it.” He was initially worried 49mm would be too large, but later said “the watch is great in size… the big watch face looks amazing.” 
  
• Customer Satisfaction: “Love this watch, it does everything… The battery life is impressive, easily lasting through a full day of use. Syncing with my iPhone seamlessly enhances the overall convenience,” says one reviewer who gave Ultra 2 a perfect rating. 

Sources: Best Buy, Target, Amazon, and Reddit.

2. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

User Rating

• Best Buy: 4.7/5 (~720+ reviews) 
• Target: 4.4/5 (~200+ reviews) 
• Amazon:4.6/5 (~500+ reviews)

Highlights 

• Rugged Premium Build & Design: Buyers applaud the titanium and sapphire construction and distinctive “squircle” design. It “feels great” and looks attractive and durable, giving confidence it can handle rough use. Many like the orange accents and sporty styling—one owner said it “turns heads” and isn’t a discreet watch, in a good way. Several received compliments on the watch in both casual and professional settings.
  
• Vibrant Display and Robust Features: The Ultra’s 1.5-inch AMOLED display is frequently praised as “spectacular—bright, sharp, and easy to read even in sunlight,” with customizable faces for any occasion. Users love that it’s packed with features—from advanced health sensors (heart rate, SpO₂, ECG) to GPS, rugged water resistance (10ATM), and an extra “Action” button. “Sooo many features! Battery life is fantastic,” raved one owner. Others highlight the outdoor sport functions (dual-frequency GPS, hiking backtrack, workout tracking modes) and say it’s “packed with outdoor-focused features” for adventures.
  
• Health and Fitness Tracking: Users report surprisingly accurate health tracking overall. Several note the heart rate, SpO₂, sleep tracking and exercise metrics “feel like having a personal health assistant on my wrist.” One user found the GPS mapping “spot on” for measured runs. Samsung’s new “Energy Score” (daily readiness metric) is cited as useful and on-point by some, factoring in sleep quality and activity to suggest how hard to push each day. Overall, casual fitness users are pleased with the breadth of wellness insights.
  
• Smooth Performance & Software: The Galaxy Watch Ultra feels snappy and responsive in daily use. Many upgraders from older Galaxy models remark on the fluidity of Wear OS 4/One UI Watch 6 on the new Exynos chip. “It’s day-and-night difference—buttery smooth, no lag or stutter,” one Reddit reviewer wrote. Apps, notifications, and Google Wallet payments run without hiccups. Unlike some earlier models, no widespread bug or crash issues are reported; one owner even noted it’s “less buggy” than their Apple Watch Ultra.
  
• Battery Life (for Many Users): Opinions on battery are mixed (see Criticism below), but a large share of users are satisfied with battery longevity. Many report getting about 2–3 days per charge with typical use. For example, a reviewer noted “I can easily get two full days of use with LTE, GPS, and continuous health monitoring enabled”, and others confirm ~3 days with moderate use. One user even managed 3.5 days on a charge with everything running, calling the battery life “great”. Compared to prior Samsung watches, this is often seen as an improvement—“best battery Samsung has put into a watch so far,” as one owner put it.
  
• Call, Connectivity & Ecosystem Integration: Users appreciate the Ultra’s LTE capability and connectivity. Several enjoy leaving their phone behind: “I can make calls, send texts, stream music, and use GPS seamlessly without my phone—perfect for runs or quick errands.” Call quality on the watch is described as clear and audible. Those in the Samsung ecosystem love the seamless sync with Galaxy phones and the ability to control apps and smart home devices from the wrist. The watch plays nicely with Android (though iOS is not supported), and features like Samsung Pay, Google Assistant, and notifications integration are cited as “effortless and convenient”.
  
• Customization & Bands: Reviewers enjoy the wide range of watch faces and easy band swapping. The new band mechanism makes changing straps “so easy”, encouraging users to dress it up or down. “There are so many free watch faces and colors to choose and download,” notes one 4★ review. Samsung offers distinct straps (Trail, Marine, etc.), and users report they’re generally high quality. A couple of owners mention loving the included orange “Marine” band for its secure fit and bold look.

Criticism

• Battery Life Under Heavy Use: Despite the generally good battery feedback, a sizeable minority expected more endurance for an “Ultra” device. Some active users find it “underwhelming” if you use all features. “I saw many reviews saying 3-4 days—I’m lucky to get 2 days,” one Reddit user lamented. Another reported 16–18 hours with always-on display and heavy apps. The consensus: 2+ days is typical, but power users (GPS workouts, always-on, LTE) may need to charge every ~1.5 days, which disappointed those coming from the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro’s longer battery. “Battery could still be beefier,” TechRadar noted, echoing several user comments.
  
• Bulky Size & Comfort Issues: At 47mm and ~60g, the Watch Ultra is a large watch, and not everyone finds it comfortable. Users with smaller wrists or those unused to big sports watches report it “feels big and bulky”. One buyer said it “does not sit comfortably on your wrist” for workouts, advising against it for serious running or weight training. A particularly harsh review complained the frame is “way too big, really thick, and the straps it came with are uncomfortable,” ultimately calling it the “worst watch made by Samsung” in terms of comfort. (It should be noted this is an outlier view—many others with small wrists still found it wearable; e.g. a 5’2″ female user said “it’s NOT too big—looks perfect!”.) Nonetheless, the heft and size are a common critique—it “may be too chunky for some” as one summary put it, especially if you prefer a sleek watch.
  
• Battery Charging Speed: A related complaint is the slow charging rate. The Ultra’s 590mAh battery can take 2 to 3 hours for a full charge on the proprietary puck. “It takes almost 2 hours on the official charger… 3+ hours on a regular charger,” one user noted. Another said it’s “roughly 3 hours from dead to 100%, always using its proprietary puck… disappointing.” For a modern premium watch, some feel this is sluggish, especially since more frequent charging is needed if you’re a heavy user.
  
• Durability Concerns (Scratches): Despite the rugged marketing, a number of users observed that the finish isn’t scratch-proof. In particular, the black bezel/“ring” around the screen seems prone to wear. “For a stronger titanium body, I was perplexed—the painted black ring… scratched off way too early, within a week of buying it,” one 3★ review noted. They found it cosmetic but disappointing given the price and durability claims. Similarly, an independent reviewer reported “a lot more scratches on the titanium frame than I hoped to see” after some months. While the screen is sapphire and very resilient (few complaints of screen damage), the case coating can show dings if knocked around. Some users recommend a bezel protector or case if scuffs would bother you.
  
• Heart Rate Accuracy for Intense Workouts: Most casual users found the health tracking fine, but serious athletes raised red flags about heart rate accuracy during intense exercise. A runner on Samsung’s forum and Reddit wrote that HR readings were “wildly inaccurate” on runs—“one day under 90bpm when it should be ~150, next day over 200 which is physiologically impossible,” they reported. This made interval training unreliable. That same user was frustrated that the watch couldn’t broadcast a live HR to certain apps or easily share location for safety during runs. A few others echoed that for high-intensity training, the Ultra’s wrist sensor can lag or err more than desired (a common limitation of optical HR sensors). Bottom line: for everyday health tracking it’s fine, but dedicated athletes found it unreliable for hardcore training metrics, sometimes “messing the experience.”
  
• Software and App Ecosystem Quirks: Some Samsung-specific quirks drew criticism. A frequent complaint is needing multiple apps on your phone—the Galaxy Wearable app, plus Samsung Health, and sometimes Samsung Health Monitor—to access all features. “You need to install at least 3 separate apps… two of these are both called Samsung Health with different icons,” one user pointed out in annoyance. The fragmentation and setup complexity irked a few. Additionally, while the new “Quick/Action button” is a welcome addition, users find it limited in customization—it can only be assigned to a few functions (workout, flashlight, etc.) with no double-press actions. Some feel this is a missed opportunity for more shortcuts. A couple of reviewers also mentioned the lack of third-party watch faces/apps compared to some platforms, though there are many official options.
  
• Missing or Region-Locked Features: A handful of users were disappointed that certain health features are not available in all regions. For example, the blood pressure monitoring and blood glucose apps (available in some countries on Samsung watches) are disabled on U.S. models due to regulatory approval. “Expensive. [The] US version does not support glucose reading or blood pressure,” one buyer noted regretfully. If those advanced metrics matter to you, this is a limitation (the watch has the necessary sensors for BP with calibration, but Samsung hasn’t enabled it in the U.S.).
  
• Price Point: Priced around $600–$700, the Galaxy Watch Ultra is one of the most expensive Android wearables. While many users felt it was worth the cost (given its tech and premium build), a few did grumble that “it’s too expensive”. It competes in price directly with Apple’s Watch Ultra. One user who initially balked at having to upgrade later admitted “Happy I was forced to… Love this watch!,” suggesting that despite the high cost, satisfaction is high once they use it. Still, budget-conscious buyers and those who don’t need all the extras might consider it overkill for the price.

Testimonials

• “Highly impressed!”: “Once the initial setup and pair was complete it was smooth sailing. Paired with [my Galaxy phone], this watch is amazing. Many surprisingly accurate health tracking features. Large bright face, easy to read. …Distance measurement and mapping were spot on [during a test walk]. Lesson: if it’s too cheap to believe, don’t believe it. The Samsung Watch Ultra won’t break the bank but likely will surpass expectations. Battery life is good and will get better as I manage all the bells and whistles. Incredible detail. Very satisfied!!” (5★ Amazon review)
  
• Praise for Design & Battery: “The watch is fantastic. I do not want Samsung to go back to a traditional circle watch. I like this square-circle thing they have going on. It lasts quite a bit (3 days), tracks my sleep and health really well, the vibration is strong as HELL, and changing the band is SO easy. I think I’ll have this watch for a while.” (5★ Amazon review)
  
• Compared to Apple’s Ultra: “I have owned the Galaxy Watch Ultra for about a month now. From someone who has (and still wears) an Apple Watch Ultra 1 also, I can say they both do exactly what I want. The Galaxy, however, to me is the better looker and is less buggy. I have not had to shut it down because of any freezing or glitches. It has tracked my workouts great, and the battery is really good… I don’t believe the battery life is better than my Apple watch, but close. …If you don’t mind big watches and you track your runs, calories, and workouts, I don’t see you going wrong by picking one up.” (5★ Amazon review by a dual Apple/Samsung user)
  
• Durability Complaint: “Like the watch… bought it since I was 3 models past and needed a watch to stand up to work demands. For a stronger titanium body, I was perplexed by the painted black ring… around the screen—scratches off way too early, within a week of buying it. Doesn’t affect the watch, but for how much it costs and claims of better scratch resistance… just a bit disappointing.” (3★ Best Buy review)
  
• Serious Athlete’s Regret: “Massively regret purchasing this watch. If you’re buying this for running, don’t. Heart rate is wildly inaccurate. One day it will claim my HR is under 90 during a run (should be in the 140s), the next it’ll have it over 200 which is impossible. A main feature I wanted was for my partner to track my location during a run, but this is near impossible. Samsung Health doesn’t work with Strava Beacon, Google Maps won’t get my location from the watch… The only option is Strava’s app, but it doesn’t work with the watch’s button—you have to try using a touchscreen with sweaty fingers in bright sunlight. I finally pulled the trigger on this watch because it supposedly has interval workouts. While technically true, the settings are so limited as to make the feature useless… You need to install at least 3 separate apps on your phone to use all of the watch’s features… I massively regret purchasing this watch and will be trying to sell it since I’m already outside of Samsung’s miserly 15-day return period.” (Reddit user review, very critical—likely equivalent to a 1★ experience)
  
• Positive All-Rounder: “The ultimate smartwatch experience! From the moment I unboxed it, I was impressed by the attention to detail and premium build quality. The titanium frame and sapphire display look stunning and feel durable. The 47mm AMOLED display is spectacular—bright, sharp, responsive… The LTE connectivity is a standout—I can leave my phone behind and still make calls, send texts, stream music, and use GPS seamlessly. Perfect for runs or hikes without being tied to my phone. Health tracking: the AI-powered sensors are incredibly accurate and insightful. Heart rate, SpO₂, advanced sleep analysis, ECG—it feels like a personal health assistant on my wrist. Detailed workout modes adapt to my activities, with real-time feedback and post-workout analysis that help me track progress. GPS is impressively accurate for my outdoor runs and cycling. Battery life was a pleasant surprise—I easily get two full days with LTE, GPS, and continuous health monitoring on. And the fast-charging gets me back to full power quickly. I appreciate the integration with Samsung’s ecosystem too—syncing with my Galaxy phone was seamless, and I can control smart home devices from my wrist. Samsung has truly raised the bar with this model. It’s not just a smartwatch—it’s a statement piece and a powerhouse in terms of performance. Simply wow!” (Best Buy 5★ “Tech Insider” style user review)
  
  Sources: Amazon, Best Buy, Reddit, and Walmart.

3. Amazfit Active 2

User Rating

• Amazon: 4.6/5 (400+ reviews)
• Best Buy: 4.6/5 (36 reviews) 
• Target: 4.4/5 (52 reviews)

Highlights 

• Excellent Battery Life: This is the #1 praise in user reviews. Owners routinely report getting a week or more on a single charge, even with heavy use. Many are delighted to “charge it only once every 10 days” instead of daily. One Target reviewer noted “it still had 60% battery after 10 days,” calling the endurance “amazing.” Best Buy customers likewise rate battery life near-perfect (4.9/5) saying the watch “goes days on a single charge”—a huge convenience compared to Apple, Samsung, or Fitbit devices.
  
• Outstanding Value (Feature Set for Price): Users love that the Active 2 offers “all the bells and whistles… without the crazy price tag.” Several experienced smartwatch owners were surprised to find “the same features and functionality (and even more)” as watches costing 3–4× more. At ~$99, it’s frequently described as a “flagship killer” and “a lot of watch for the money.” Health tracking (heart rate, SpO₂, sleep, 160+ sports modes), built-in GPS navigation, phone call support, voice assistant, and even offline maps are included—an almost unheard-of feature at this price. As one reviewer put it, the Active 2 “packs so many features into its $100 price” that it feels like a steal.
  
• Bright Display & Premium Build: The watch’s 1.3–1.75″ AMOLED display earns high praise for being vibrant, sharp, and easy to read, even under sunlight. Users love the stylish design: an aluminum alloy case with a metal bezel that “looks and feels more premium than expected,” giving it a classy look. Many were pleasantly surprised by the build quality at this price point—“the screen is crisp and bright… the casing is solid with a nice weight,” according to one detailed review. Several buyers opted for the Premium edition (with sapphire crystal and leather band) and found it “incredibly stylish,” saying it “feels like a luxury accessory, not just a fitness tracker.”
  
• Comfortable & Lightweight Design: Reviewers consistently mention that the Active 2 is comfortable for all-day wear. The 44mm case is described as a good medium size—“not too big, not too small”—and even users with small wrists say “it’s the perfect size” and not bulky. At ~36g, it’s light enough to sleep in, and people report it “wears comfortably all day.” The included silicone sport band gets positive remarks for breathability and comfort (some mention the band has ventilation holes that “feel better than a solid band”). Overall, the watch is often forgotten on the wrist—“very small and light… very comfortable,” as one Best Buy reviewer noted.
  
• Reliable Fitness & Health Tracking: Users generally find the Active 2’s sensors and tracking accurate and useful. Step counting, continuous heart-rate monitoring, sleep analysis, and even blood oxygen readings are reported to work “flawlessly.” Several buyers compared it against premium devices (Garmin Venu 3, Fitbit bands, etc.) and found no major discrepancies. One owner with atrial fibrillation was pleased that “it keeps track of my heart rate quite well,” giving confidence in the health stats. The watch supports 160+ sports modes, and casual athletes say the GPS tracking for runs/walks is solid and the companion Zepp app provides rich fitness data. Sleep tracking accuracy earned special mention—one user found it even caught wake-ups that their Garmin missed. In summary, for everyday fitness and wellness monitoring, users feel the Active 2 is “reliable” and “does everything I need it to do.”
  
• Standout Features at this Price: Beyond the basics, a few features really impressed users:
  
  • Built-in GPS & Navigation: The Active 2 can display maps and route navigation on-wrist, which many found “pretty crazy for a watch at this price point.” Hikers and runners appreciated being able to follow routes and see tracked maps without a phone. Some did note minor quirks (e.g. difficulty saving very large map regions), but overall having this function on a ~$100 device was a huge plus for many.
  • Notifications & Calls: Users report that pairing the watch with a smartphone allows call alerts, text notifications, and even quick replies or voice replies for texts. One Best Buy reviewer noted the recent firmware update enabled voice-to-text replies for messages, which they found “very nice.” Others simply enjoyed seeing calls, texts, and app notifications on the wrist, saying it “works well with messaging” and helps them stay connected without checking the phone. Speaker and Mic capabilities mean you can take phone calls on the watch in a pinch—a feature few budget watches offer (users say it works, though call quality is just okay).
  • Voice Assistant: The Active 2 includes Amazon Alexa or a Zepp voice assistant (depending on region)—a few owners were “pleasantly surprised” by how useful it is for quick queries (weather, setting reminders, etc.). This again is a rare perk in the budget range.
  • Durability: Though a lightweight daily watch, it’s 5 ATM water-resistant (safe for swimming and showers), which active users appreciate. A number of reviews remark on the solid build holding up to workouts and even the occasional drop. The Premium model’s sapphire glass is noted for scratch resistance, enhancing longevity.

Criticism

• Software & App Quirks: The watch runs Zepp OS and syncs via the Zepp mobile app—a point of some frustration. A few call the app “clunky” or not very intuitive. Notably, several notifications issues were reported: one Target reviewer said after a few weeks they “stopped getting text messages on the watch,” and emails only appeared if the phone app was opened. This suggests the app may need to run in the background for full functionality, which some find inconvenient. In general, “the app could be more user-friendly” and the watch UI can feel complex until you learn it. A couple of Best Buy users struggled to find certain features in the menus, calling the interface “complicated to operate” at first. These are not deal-breakers for most, but there is a learning curve and room for software refinement.
  
• Limited Watch Face Customization: Unlike some pricier watches, you can’t deeply customize data fields on the default watch faces. Users who like to see many stats at once were disappointed that they “can’t see everything at a glance—steps, HR, date, calories—on one screen.” There are plenty of downloadable faces, but one Amazon reviewer noted many good ones cost extra and “watchfaces are not very customizable” in terms of choosing your own complications. This was a minor gripe for data-heavy users, though others felt there are “plenty of faces to download for free” if you’re flexible.
  
• No NFC Payments (and Premium Version Confusion): The standard Active 2 does not have NFC, and even the Premium edition (which technically includes an NFC chip) currently cannot do contactless payments in most regions. This led to some confusion and disappointment. A UK buyer of the Premium model expected to use Zepp Pay, only to find the app missing and the NFC unusable—“several other users have found it impossible to access the advertised NFC feature,” and Amazfit support provided no clear answers. In short, mobile payments are effectively absent, which some budget competitors (e.g. older Fitbits) do offer. If paying via watch is important to you, users warn that Active 2 won’t deliver that.
  
• Missing or Niche Features: A small number of reviewers wished for features that the Active 2 lacks. For example, it does not have on-board music storage or LTE (expected at this price), and one user noted it doesn’t natively measure blood pressure (they had mistakenly hoped it would). Advanced athletes point out it’s limited to single-band GPS (no multi-band), though accuracy is still decent. Customization options in general are a bit limited (as noted above), and one user simply felt the watch didn’t offer enough data at once for power-users. In summary, it covers all core smart/fitness functions, but it’s not as feature-packed as a $300+ Garmin or Apple Watch (no ECG, no apps marketplace, no payment, etc.). Most buyers expected this trade-off given the price, but it’s worth noting.
  
• Minor Hardware Complaints: The vast majority have had no hardware problems, but a few isolated issues came up:
  
  • Skin Irritation: In a very isolated case, a user experienced skin burns on their wrist from the sensors or strap after wearing the watch for a month. This appears to be an outlier (most find the band and back comfortable), but it’s a reminder to keep the area clean and not wear the strap too tight. Anyone with sensitive skin or a nickel allergy might want to use a different band, just in case.
  • Strap Quality: The included silicone strap is generally liked, but those who got the Premium leather strap were underwhelmed—one owner called it “not very good,” preferring the basic rubber band. Luckily, the watch uses standard 20mm bands, so it’s easy to swap in a third-party strap of your choice.
  • Size for Larger Wrists: While many appreciate the watch’s moderate 44mm size, a couple of users with big wrists wished it were a tad larger/thicker for a bolder look. This is subjective, but if you prefer very large watch faces, the Active 2 might feel on the smaller side.

Testimonials

• “I’ve been through quite a few smartwatches… That’s why I’ve been so surprised by the Active 2 after a week of testing. It packs so many features into its $100 price that I don’t think I’ll return to Garmin.” (Amazon 5★ review)
  
• “I decided to try the Amazfit Active 2, and it was an amazing experience! The first thing that impressed me was the battery life—it actually lasts 10 days without needing daily charging. All the trackers work flawlessly: sleep, heart rate, sports modes—everything is accurate and reliable. The watch is comfortable, lightweight, and stylish, fitting perfectly on the wrist. The built-in GPS maps with navigation are a great bonus, making workouts and travel easier.” (Amazon 5★ review)
  
• “This watch has exceeded my expectations! I purchased it on sale after Christmas and it is worth every penny. I wanted a lot of watch for a small investment, and I feel like I got the perfect watch for me. It has many useful health features that I didn’t realize I would use as much as I do. The battery life is amazing! Great smartwatch.” (Best Buy 5★ review)
  
• “Not enough features. I like to see everything at a glance—steps, HR, date, calories burned. (No, I would not recommend this.)” (Best Buy 2★ review)
  
  Sources: Amazon, Target, Best Buy, and Reddit.

4. Garmin Venu 3

User Rating

• Target: 4.5/5 (~690+ reviews)
• Best Buy: 4.6/5 (~420+ Reviews)
• Amazon: 4.4/5 (~3,500+ reviews)

Highlights 

• Exceptional Battery Life: By far the most praised aspect is battery longevity. Users repeatedly report getting a week or more per charge, which is a huge advantage over many smartwatches. Best Buy data shows “battery life” mentioned in 167 reviews as the #1 pro. Many owners celebrate going “days without needing a charge,” with some stretching to ~10–14 days depending on settings. Words like “battery lasts forever” are common in reviews, highlighting how the Venu 3’s power management exceeds expectations.
  
• Health & Fitness Tracking: Users love the comprehensive health monitoring and accurate fitness tracking. The Venu 3’s heart-rate, sleep, and activity tracking features are frequently praised for their accuracy and depth. Owners mention the HRV status, Body Battery™, sleep score, and even the new ECG app as valuable additions. One Amazon user noted it’s “like having a personal coach and wellness tracker on my wrist,” given how much insight the watch provides into sleep and stress levels. Fitness enthusiasts report that GPS and workout tracking are spot-on and reliable, whether for running, cycling, swimming or gym workouts. The wide range of 30+ sport modes (including wheelchair-specific modes) means most people find their activities covered.
  
• Outstanding Battery + Fitness Combo (Switching from Other Brands): A recurring theme is users switching from Apple, Samsung, or Fitbit and finding the Venu 3 a revelation. Many appreciate finally having a smartwatch that doesn’t need daily charging but still offers rich features. For instance, sleep tracking is actually feasible with the multi-day battery. Several ex-Fitbit owners cite the “excellent battery life” and more robust health stats as reasons they prefer the Venu 3. Likewise, former Apple Watch users mention that while the Venu 3’s smart app ecosystem isn’t as vast, its fitness focus and endurance better suit their needs (especially those who also use Garmin devices for sports).
  
• Comfortable Design & Display: The Venu 3 is often described as comfortable for all-day wear (lightweight and not bulky) and stylish enough for both workouts and daily life. Users love the bright AMOLED display, calling it vibrant, clear in sunlight, and simply “gorgeous”. Customizable watch faces and bands let users tailor the look; many enjoy switching faces for work, gym, or dressier occasions. Overall build quality feels solid to most owners and the 45mm size (or 41mm in the 3S model) hits a sweet spot for many wrists.
  
• Feature-Rich and Easy to Use: Despite its many capabilities, users generally find the Venu 3 user-friendly after an initial learning curve. The interface and Garmin Connect app earn kudos for straightforward navigation and presenting a “wealth of information” on health metrics. Initial setup and phone pairing are usually quick (several noted it took only ~10 minutes). People appreciate convenient extras like built-in music storage, Bluetooth calling, and contactless payments (Garmin Pay) as rounding out a full-featured smartwatch package. The watch’s customizable features (e.g. creating watch faces, choosing widgets, configuring workouts) are highlighted by many as a strong point.
  
• Notable Niche Praises: Some specific features get shout-outs. For example, sleep coaching and nap tracking (new to Venu 3) delight users trying to improve rest habits. The addition of a speaker & mic is welcomed—users enjoy being able to answer calls or use voice assistant from the watch. Garmin’s support also earns praise in cases where issues arose: “Support has been fantastic,” one owner wrote after prompt help with their device.

Criticism 

• High Price Point: The most common downside in reviews is cost. At ~$400–450 initially, some feel the Venu 3 is “a bit high” in price. A number of buyers comment that while it’s expensive, they ultimately feel the value is justified by its features; however, a few say they’d have liked to see a lower price or more premium materials given the cost. Price was the #1 con noted on Best Buy (though only by 6 users, versus hundreds praising other aspects).
  
• Minor Software Glitches & Connectivity Issues: A subset of users have experienced Bluetooth connectivity problems or other bugs. For example, one Target reviewer reported frequent “phone disconnected… phone connected” flip-flopping until a reset was done. A few others mention needing to reboot the watch or app on occasion when notifications or syncing failed. On Garmin’s forums, a few users reported Bluetooth disconnects after a software update. These issues don’t seem universal, but they crop up enough to be noted. Firmware updates over the past year have addressed some bugs, but a couple of users still felt the Venu 3 could be more “polished” in connectivity.
  
• Hardware Defects (Isolated Cases): While most find the build quality solid, there are isolated reports of defects. One user said their original unit died after 11 months and the replacement had issues too. Another 1-star review complained the watch “felt like a cheap watch” and that their screen stopped working after 3 months (an extreme outlier). Such cases are rare, and often these users did get a warranty replacement, but they underscore that not everyone’s experience was flawless.
  
• Screen and Band Durability: A few users warn that the screen can scratch easily if unprotected. The Venu 3 uses Gorilla Glass 3, which is generally durable, but at least a couple of reviewers recommend applying a screen protector (after picking up scuffs during hikes/workouts). Tech bloggers also noted the display’s scratch vulnerability. The included silicone band is comfortable for most, but a few found it a bit “cheap” feeling or swapped it out for a third-party band for style or comfort reasons.
  
• Limited Smartwatch Apps/Functions (vs. Apple/Android Watches): As a Garmin, the Venu 3 focuses on fitness; some users coming from Apple or Samsung miss certain smart features. Third-party app selection on Garmin’s Connect IQ store is much smaller, which a few tech-savvy users note. Additionally, texting/replying capabilities are limited—iPhone users cannot respond to texts from the watch (they can only view notifications), and even on Android the on-watch replies are basic. One reviewer noted disappointment that “the watch doesn’t allow replying to messages” on their phone. If advanced smartwatch apps or full keyboard texting are a priority, a few users felt the Venu 3 falls short of true “smartwatch” rivals, calling it fantastic as a fitness watch with smart extras rather than a full-blown smartwatch.
  
• Miscellaneous Gripes: Individual reviews call out various minor wishes. A couple of athletes missed certain sport modes (one lamented the lack of a “yard work” or kayaking activity that their older Garmin had). Another user found the button layout inconvenient—the middle button can be accidentally pressed, sometimes launching the voice assistant unintentionally. A few note that Garmin’s interface takes time to learn if you’re used to other ecosystems—the Venu 3 provides a lot of data, which can be overwhelming until you get the hang of it. Lastly, charging is via a proprietary cable (no wireless charging), which one or two people listed as a con (simply because they’d like one less cable in their life).

Testimonials

• “Ticks Every Box for Me”: “From the sleek, stylish design to the incredible functionality, this smartwatch ticks every box for fitness tracking and everyday use… The battery life is amazing—I can go days without needing a charge. It’s like having a personal coach on my wrist. Highly recommend!” (5★ Amazon review)
  
• “Glad I Made the Switch”: A longtime Fitbit user wrote that after 9 years with Fitbit they switched to the Venu 3 and are “very happy I did.” They highlight the better interface, tons of watch face options, and say “I’m in LOVE with the battery life.” While it cost more than their old tracker, “it was worth every penny.” (5★ Target review)
  
• “Health Features Literally Helped My Health”: One user shared a story of how the Venu 3’s advanced health tracking made a real difference. After feeling ill, they used the watch’s ECG app, which flagged an AFib (irregular heartbeat) that their doctor later confirmed. They said the stress, sleep, and heart data from the watch helped them communicate with their doctors about what was happening in their body. This reviewer ended up pairing the Venu 3 with other Garmin health devices and called these features “extremely helpful surprises” that they “certainly used more than I thought I would.” It’s an extreme example, but it shows some users truly value the Venu 3 as a health companion, not just a step counter. (5★ Amazon review)
  
• “Best Fitness Smartwatch I’ve Ever Owned”: “Battery lasts 7+ days. I use this to track everything. The UI has improved so much… I love this watch and if you’re serious about fitness tracking, you will too.” This kind of sentiment—that the Venu 3 is an ideal blend of long battery life and robust fitness features—is echoed in many Best Buy reviews and Reddit threads. (5★ Best Buy review)
  
• “Don’t Waste Your Money”: Not everyone was impressed. One frustrated owner wrote: “I bought this watch to replace my Venu 2… In short, don’t waste your money on this watch as the basic functions don’t work.” This person had repeated GPS failures on two units. (1★ Amazon review) Another 1★ review on Amazon claimed the watch felt cheaply built and their battery life and screen durability were far worse than expected. These negative testimonials are rare, but they underscore that a few users did encounter serious issues that soured their experience.

Sources: Target, Best Buy, and Amazon.

5. Google Pixel Watch

User Rating 

• Best Buy: 4.4/5 (~800 reviews)
• Amazon: 4.2/5 ( ~1,700 reviews)
• Target: 3.9/5 (~70 reviews)

Highlights 

• Battery Life (Improved): A top relief for many Pixel Watch 2 owners is the longer battery life compared to the first model. Users report that the watch “actually lasts all day” on a charge, and some even manage ~2 days with careful use. Many appreciate that it comfortably makes it from morning through night (including sleep tracking) on one charge. This is a major improvement over the original Pixel Watch, which often struggled to last a full day. Reviewers also love the fast charging—a quick charge can top it up enough for several hours of use. (That said, battery expectations differ: some heavy users still end up charging nightly; more on that below.)
  
• Comfortable, Stylish Design: The Pixel Watch’s design gets frequent praise. Users describe it as sleek, refined, and comfortable to wear all day. The distinctive dome-shaped glass “looks amazing” according to one Reddit user, and many love the available watch faces and band styles. Its compact 41mm size suits those with smaller wrists, and the watch’s minimalist, premium look is often compared favorably to the Apple Watch. Several owners mention the Pixel Watch 2 “complements [their] Pixel phone” nicely in terms of style. Overall build quality feels solid, and aside from some reports of scratches (see Criticism), most find the materials and fit and finish satisfying for the price.
  
• Health & Fitness Tracking (Fitbit Integration): A big selling point is that Pixel Watch integrates the Fitbit fitness tracking ecosystem, which users generally appreciate. Many reviews highlight accurate heart-rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and exercise tracking. For example, one user wrote that “it tracks all kinds of stuff… a great way to see what I’m doing activity-wise.” GPS performance is reportedly excellent: runners comment that GPS tracking is “fantastic—pretty much always spot on” for distance and routes. The improved heart-rate sensor in Pixel Watch 2 has drawn praise for its accuracy during workouts and for features like stress detection. Essentially, users feel they’re getting the full Fitbit experience (daily step counts, Active Zone Minutes, sleep scores, etc.) combined with a true smartwatch. The health features like ECG and heart rhythm notifications also add peace of mind, and the new Safety Check emergency alert feature is seen as a welcome bonus.
  
• Smooth Performance & Google Integration: Another highlight is the watch’s snappier performance and tight integration with Android/Google services. Thanks to an updated processor, Pixel Watch 2 feels “fast and fluid” in day-to-day use. Apps launch quicker and the interface is smooth, which is an improvement noted by many who felt the first-gen watch was occasionally sluggish. Users also love that they have the Google ecosystem on their wrist—apps like Google Assistant, Google Home controls, Maps, Wallet, Gmail/Calendar, etc., all readily available. “It’s great to have the whole Google app ecosystem available right away,” one Reddit user noted. Notifications from a paired Android (especially Pixel) phone work reliably, and setup is simple—several owners mention the watch is “easy to set up and customize.” Unlike some Wear OS watches that work best with specific phone brands, the Pixel Watch 2 is lauded as “the best Android smartwatch” for Google users overall. Even those using non-Pixel Android phones report that all features work fully (no features gated to Pixel phones), making it a versatile choice.
  
• Additional Appreciated Points: Users frequently mention the bright, vibrant display (easy to read even outdoors), the improved haptic feedback (its gentle vibrations are “heaps ahead” of some competitors like Samsung’s watches), and conveniences like water resistance and onboard Google Wallet for payments. The new sensors in Pixel Watch 2 (for stress and skin temperature) are not talked about as much in casual reviews, but tech reviewers note they add to the watch’s health capabilities even if still somewhat niche. Finally, many owners were happy to find that band/charger compatibility improved—for instance, Pixel Watch 2 can even use Fitbit Sense 2 chargers, and a larger-size strap is included in the box for those with bigger wrists (addressing a complaint some had with first-gen bands).

Criticism

• Battery Life Still 1-Day for Many: While improved, the battery life is not truly multi-day. A common refrain is that the Pixel Watch 2 “needs daily charging” for most users, especially if you use features like always-on display, sleep tracking, and GPS workouts. Those coming from fitness bands or certain Samsung/Garmin watches expected more endurance—some report the watch can drop to low battery by evening if heavily used (or earlier if something is wrong). A few Reddit users even complained of battery drain issues (in some cases due to software bugs or settings) that led to “not even lasting an 8-hour work day” until fixed. The consensus is that you’ll still be charging the Pixel Watch pretty much every day, even if it’s now more convenient to top-up quickly. This isn’t a deal-breaker for most (who charge it during a shower or before bed), but anyone seeking a multi-day smartwatch will be disappointed. One Walmart reviewer summed it up: “Great watch… [but] the only downside is the battery doesn’t last long.”
  
• One Size (Small) & Form Factor: The Pixel Watch’s single 41mm case size is a sore point for some users—particularly those with large wrists or who prefer a big display. Several reviewers comment that the watch “is too small” or would be better with size options. Unlike Apple or Samsung which offer multiple case sizes, Google’s choice to stick with one size limits its appeal for those wanting a larger screen or battery. The dome-shaped glass design, while beautiful, also means durability concerns: a few users have reported scratches or even cracked screens from mild knocks. “We wrecked another Pixel Watch screen… without trying,” noted one tech review, and on forums some have recommended applying a screen protector. The recycled aluminum case on Pixel Watch 2 is lightweight but not as premium-feeling (or as scratch-resistant) as the stainless steel on the original watch. A handful of users lament that change, though most are fine with it since it makes the watch lighter—just be aware the casing can scuff more easily.
  
• Charging Quirks: A few charging-related gripes come up. Pixel Watch uses a proprietary magnetic pogo-pin charger—it doesn’t support Qi wireless charging, which some users wished for. Also, Google (like many manufacturers now) does not include a charging brick in the box, so you need to use an existing USB-C adapter. This surprised some buyers. Owners of the first-gen Pixel Watch found that the new model cannot use the old charger (and vice-versa) due to slight changes, which was an annoyance for those who had spares. Overall charging is fast, but a few users mention the watch may stop charging at ~99% if left overnight (perhaps a software quirk to preserve battery health). It’s not a major issue, but a minor nitpick a couple of people noted when “it didn’t fully charge overnight.” The key takeaway is you’ll need to use the included cable (or a compatible Fitbit charger) and have your own power plug.
  
• Price and Value: When it launched at $349, some users felt the Pixel Watch 2 was expensive for the specs. It’s a premium price for a watch that, while feature-rich, has a smaller screen and shorter battery life than some competitors. In user reviews, cost is occasionally mentioned as a con. However, as time went on, sales and bundle deals (like with Pixel phones) have made it more palatable. Many who got the watch as part of a promo or at a discount feel it’s a good value; but at full price, a few still question if it’s worth $349 compared to alternatives. The cost of accessories also comes up: proprietary Google/Fitbit bands can be pricey (often $50+ each), and one user pointed out the official metal band costs almost a third of the watch’s price. The included basic band works fine for most, but if you want to swap styles, third-party bands are a popular budget solution since Google’s own are costly.
  
• Miscellaneous Complaints: A smattering of other critiques appear in user feedback. Some health enthusiasts note that the Pixel Watch lacks certain advanced health sensors or features found elsewhere—for example, there’s no on-demand SpO₂ blood oxygen app (it only logs SpO₂ during sleep quietly in the background), and no skin temperature readout for the user yet. A Best Buy reviewer remarked it’s “one of the best [smartwatches] unless you need blood oxygen sensing.” A few users have reported software bugs or syncing issues, though not widespread—one Redditor even called their unit a “total disaster,” citing glitches, but this isn’t the norm. Speaker and sound: the built-in speaker is handy for calls or alarms, but a couple of people found its quality poor at high volumes (tinny sound on calls). LTE model trade-offs: Users who bought the LTE version caution that you’ll need to pay for an extra line on your cell plan to use LTE, which adds cost—something to keep in mind if you don’t strictly need standalone connectivity. Lastly, while most find the watch easy to use, a minority mention an initial learning curve (between Wear OS and the Fitbit app, there are many features to configure). Overall, none of these deal-breakers affect the majority of users, but they’re points raised by some.

Testimonials 

• “Awesome watch! Very happy with the quality and performance… Battery lasts two days with normal use. Works seamlessly with my Pixel phone.” (ebay.com)
  
• “Great watch. My husband loves all the features. Only 1 downside he’s noticed is the battery doesn’t last long.” (walmart.com)
  
• “The dome design makes the watch more vulnerable to scratches but it looks amazing… I love some of the new watch faces. Haptic feedback is heaps ahead of my Samsung [Galaxy Watch] 4.” (reddit.com)
  
• “For fitness it’s quite good. The GPS is fantastic—it’s pretty much always spot on… [I’ve only seen it] off by a few feet [occasionally].” (reddit.com) 

Sources: Target, Walmart, Amazon, Best Buy, and Reddit.